Archives

  • 2019-10
  • 2019-11
  • 2020-03
  • 2020-07
  • 2020-08
  • 2021-03
  • br Bell CL Somogyi Zalud E Masaki KH Methodological review

    2019-11-11


    21. Bell CL, Somogyi-Zalud E, Masaki KH. Methodological review: measured and reported congruence between preferred and actual place of death. Palliat Me 2009;23:
    22. StataCorp. Stata: Release 15 Statistical Software. College Station, TX: Stata Corp LLC, 2017.
    23. Cohen J, Pivodic L, Miccinesi G, et al. International study of the place of death of people with cancer: a population-level comparison of 14 countries across 4 conti-nents using death certificate data. Br J Cancer 2015;113: 1397e1404.
    24. Tang ST, Mccorkle R. Determinants of congruence be-tween the preferred and actual place of death for terminally ill cancer patients. J Palliat Care 2003;19:230e237.
    25. Noncommunicable Diseases Global Monitoring Frame-work: Indicator Definitions and Specifications. World Health Organisation, 2014. Available from https://www.who.int/ nmh/ncd-tools/indicators/GMF_Indicator_Definitions_Ver sion_NOV2014.pdf. Accessed January 21, 2019.
    26. Shen MJ, Prigerson HG, Ratshikana-Moloko M, et al. Illness understanding and end-of-life care communication and preferences for patients with advanced cancer in South Africa. J Glob Oncol 2018:1e9.
    27. Agar M, Currow C, Shelby-James TM, et al. Preference for place of care and place of death in palliative care: are these different questions? Palliat Me 2008;22:787e795. Original Study
    A Prospective Cohort Study on the Impact of Reflexology in Patients With Breast Cancer Using the MYCaW Scale
    Ayush K. Kapila, Allison Herd, Natalie Knife, Pauly Chaplin, Ashraf Patel
    Abstract
    We studied the effects of reflexology quantitatively in 52 patients using the “Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing” questionnaire. There was a statistically significant overall improvement of 44.2% in patient con-cerns, 41.2% in well-being, and 42.4% in Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing scores for all patients. Patients with poor Minocycline HCl level, sleep problems, stress, and hot flushes and sweats experienced the most improvement.
    Introduction: Breast cancer treatment and recovery remain physically and psychologically challenging for patients. Reflexology has been studied as a complementary therapy to help relieve patients of the physical and psychological stresses involved with breast cancer. As a result of recent positive evidence, we studied its effects quantitatively from 2015 to 2016. Patients and Methods: Fifty-two patients completed pre- and post-reflexology intervention ‘Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing’ (MYCaW) questionnaires. Patients were subdivided into breast cancer (BC) and non-breast cancer (NBC) groups. Concerns raised were subdivided in subcategory groups as per MYCaW guidelines and analyzed for improvements in each domain. Results: Thirty (57.7%) patients in the BC group and 22 (42.3%) patients in the NBC group were analyzed. In the BC group, there was a 46.2% improvement in patients’ concerns, and in the NBC group, a 41.4% improvement in concerns were noted. Overall, the symptoms improved by 44.2% (P <
    .0001). There was an improvement of 43.4% in patient well-being in the BC group, and a 37.8% change in the NBC group, signifying a total improvement in well-being of 41.2%. There was an improvement of 46.4% in the MYCaW scores; 46.4% in the BC group and 42.6% in the NBC group, signifying a combined average improvement of 42.4%. Patients with poor energy level, sleep problems, stress and tension, and hot flushes and sweats experienced the most improvement in their concerns. Conclusions: Our findings show that reflexology has significantly improved patient-reported outcomes using the MYCaW scale. These findings are encouraging and reflect that increased attention to strategies focusing on improving psychological well-being can help patients in managing their symptoms.